22/11/2006

How would you like your computer to run 18 billion times faster?

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


Check out this article from ITWorldCanada. Mind bending!

A picture named M2


Future PCs could run 18 billion, billion times faster

By: Chris Mellor
Techworld.com  (22 Nov 2006)

How would you like your computer to run 18 billion, billion times faster?

According to a University of Utah physicist, he has taken the first step toward creating a quantum computer that would make that possible.

The increase relies on a quantum bit (qubit) being both a binary one and a binary zero at the same time but in different places. In quantum (sub-atomic) physics the smallest particles of light and matter can be in different places at the same time.

Christian Boehme working on quantum computer read out technology. Boehme working on quantum computer read out technology

With today's computers an electric bit (binary digit) can be either one (off) or zero (on). This means that with three bits today's computers can store only one of the eight possible combinations of 1 and 0: 1-1-1, 0-1-1, 1-0-1, 1-1-0, 0-0-0, 1-0-0, 0-1-0 and 0-0-1.

However, a quantum computer could store all eight combinations in three bits. Theoretically, a 3-qubit quantum computer could calculate eight times faster than a 3-bit PC. Following the maths, a 64-qubit quantum computer could therefore make calculations 2 to the power 64 times faster than a 64-bit PC -- meaning 18 billion, billion times quicker.

The physicist, Christoph Boehme, assistant professor of physics at the University of Utah, read data stored in the form of the magnetic "spins" of a group of thousands of phosphorus atoms. He said: "We have demonstrated experimentally that the nuclear spin orientation of phosphorus atoms embedded in silicon can be measured by very subtle electric currents passing through the phosphorus atoms.

"We have resolved a major obstacle for building a particular kind of quantum computer, the phosphorus-and-silicon quantum computer," says Boehme. "For this concept, data readout is the biggest issue, and we have shown a new way to read data."

The work is based on an approach to a quantum computer proposed in 1998 by Australian physicist Bruce Kane in a Nature paper titled "A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer." In such a computer, silicon -- the semiconductor used in digital computer chips -- would be "doped" with atoms of phosphorus, and data would be encoded in the "spins" of those atoms' nuclei. Externally applied electric fields would be used to read and process the data stored as "spins." Boehme claims it is technically feasible to read the spin of single phosphorus atoms.

He reckons quantum computers are many years away though: "If you want to compare the development of quantum computers with classical computers, we probably would be just before the discovery of the abacus," he says. "We are very early in development." Zillion times slower brain:machine interface

Equally fantastic is Hitachi research showing that a human could control an on:off switch by merely thinking about it. Non-invasive optical topography was used to detect changes in the volume of blood in areas of the brain's pre-frontal cortex as subjects carried out mental arithmetic or imagined singing a song. Detected changes were used to turn a model railway on or off.

Optical topography uses infrared light, which can penetrate to the upper levels of the brain and be reflected back, to measure changes in blood volume and hemoglobin concentrations in the brain. It takes just a tenth of a second to carry out a reading

Hitachi hopes that the technique could lead to a capable brain:machine interface for physically impaired patients. It hopes that practical results could result in products by 2011 -- decades before a quantum computer might be built. It is unlikely to be used for calculation.

12/12/2006

Replication statistics

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


Today, I had one of those really weird things happen to me in Notes. I ended up having to replicate the Student Directory between two servers: PROMETHEUS and ARES. At the end, Notes displayed its typical 'Replication Statistics' box, but what was in the box was not so typical at all..... check this out....! WOW!

A picture named M2

Amazingly, after it was all done the directory seemed OK.... By the way, your typical 'Replication statistics' box after replicating just one database would look more like this:


A picture named M3

03/07/2007

Surface Computing - the next big thing?

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

Check this out:
PopularMechnics.com video on surface computing technology

07/04/2008

The nature of “dark matter” to be revealed soon...?

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


Did you enjoy reading Dan Brown's "Angels and Demons"? Then you may find this press release interesting...

On 6 April 2008, CERN1 will open its doors to the public, offering a unique chance to visit its newest and largest particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), before it goes into operation later this year. This scientific instrument, the largest and most complex in the world, is installed in a 27 km tunnel, 100 metres underground in the Swiss canton of Geneva and neighbouring France.

[ full story ]

30/09/2008

More replication statistics... :)

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


Remember this one time I get a strange results replicating someone's mailbox between the two servers?

Well, it happened again, this one is form Notes 8.0.2, and the numbers are slightly different... :)

A picture named M2

RSS FEEDS

Browse By Day

Me

bodek@uwindsor.ca
519-253-3000 x2801

BodekSept2006Small.jpg

Powered By

Domino BlogSphere
Version 3.0.1 Beta 6